Protagoras and Antiphon on justice and law
Keywords:
Protagoras, Antiphon, justice, lawAbstract
This paper presents the ideas of law and justice of two sophists, Protagoras and Antiphon. The aim is to show that their positions on the nómos-phýsis controversy, although often seen as opposed, can be understood simply as different answers to the same question. Antiphon does not despise the law, nor does embrace a natural law distinct from the positive one. Like Protagoras, he starts from the conventionality of justice and expresses interest in the advantageous decisions of the State. But while Protagoras assumes democratic deliberation as a criterion to define the utility established by the laws, Antiphon criticizes the agreements that, instead of benefiting citizens, limit the possibilities of action and produce harms.
References
ANTIFONTE. Testemunhos. Fragmentos. Discursos. Tradução de Luís Felipe Bellintani Ribeiro. São Paulo: Loyola, 2008.
BALAUDÉ, Jean-François. Les théories de la justice dans l’Antiquité. Paris: Nathan, 1996.
BONAZZI, Mauro. I sofisti. Roma: Carocci, 2010.
CASSIN, Barbara. O efeito sofístico: sofística, filosofia, retórica, literatura. Tradução de Ana Lúcia de Oliveira, Maria Cristina Franco Ferraz e Paulo Pinheiro. São Paulo: Ed. 34, 2005.
DECLEVA CAIZZI, Fernanda. Protágoras e Antifonte: debates sofísticos acerca da justiça. In: LONG, A. A. (org.). Primórdios da filosofia grega. Tradução de Paulo Ferreira. Aparecida, SP: Idéias e Letras, 2008, p. 389-411.
FASSÒ, Guido. Il diritto naturale. Torino: ERI, 1964.
FURLEY, David J. Antiphon’s case against justice. In: KERFERD, G. B. (org.). The sophists and their legacy. Wiesbaden: Verlag, 1981, p. 81-91.
GAGARIN, Michael. Antiphon the Athenian. Oratory, law and justice in the age of the sophists. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2002.
KERFERD, G. B. O movimento sofista. Tradução de Margarida Oliva. São Paulo: Loyola, 2003.
KOESTER, Helmut. ΝΟΜΟΣ ΦΥΣΕΩΣ. The concept of natural law in Greek thought. In: NEUSNER, Jacob (org.). Religions in Antiquity. Essays in Memory of Erwin Ramsdell Goodenough. Leiden: Brill, 1970, p. 521-541.
LEVYSTONE, David. Antiphon: indifférence de la nature, misère des lois humaines. Phoenix, v. 68, n. 3-4, 2014, p. 258-290.
MOSCARELLI, Laura. Antiphon d’Athènes et l’antidogmatisme philosophique et juridique. Fragments et témoignages. Paris: L’Harmattan, 2020.
MOSSÉ, Claude. Au nom de la loi. Justice et politique à Athènes à l’âge classique. Paris: Payot, 2010.
NESCHKE-HENTSCHKE, Ada. Platonisme politique et théorie du droit naturel. v. I: Le platonisme politique dans l’antiquité. Louvain-Paris: Éditions Peeters, 1995.
OSTWALD, Martin. Nomos and phusis in Antiphon’s Περὶ Ἀληθείας. In: GRIFFITH, Mark; MASTRONARDE, Donald J. (orgs.). Cabinet of the Muses: essays on classical and comparative literature in honor of Thomas G. Rosenmeyer. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1990, p. 293-306.
PLATÃO. Protágoras. Tradução de Daniel R. N. Lopes. São Paulo: Perspectiva, 2017.
PLATÃO. Teeteto. Tradução de Adriana Manuela Nogueira e Marcelo Boeri. 3. ed. Lisboa: Calouste Gulbenkian, 2010.
ROMILLY, Jacqueline de. La loi dans la pensée grecque: des origines à Aristote. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1971.
SAUNDERS, Trevor J. Antiphon the Sophist on natural laws (B44DK). Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, v. 78, 1978, p. 215-236.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Hypnos Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The contents of the manuscript have been tacitly or explicitly approved by the responsible authorities where the research was carried out.
Upon acceptation of the manuscript, the author agrees to allow its publication by Hypnos, declining pecuniary gains due from copyright. If the manuscript is published later in other media, the author agrees to always give credits of its first publication in Hypnos.
If the submitted document includes figures, tables, or large sections of text previously published, the author declares himself responsible for having obtained permission of the original copyright owners of these items for both the online and printed publication of this journal. Credits for copyrighted material must be properly attributed in the manuscript.