From Perfect Paradigmatism to Eidetic Paradigmatism: A Reconstruction of the Platonic Paradigm

Authors

Keywords:

Plato, synonymy, Forms, relatives

Abstract

This article proposes a reconstruction of Platonic paradigmatism as a relational structure that articulates different levels of reality, which I call “eidetic paradigmatism.” In contrast to Gail Fine’s interpretation of the Platonic paradigm as “perfect paradigmatism,” and Dirk Baltzly’s alternative of truth-makers, this article argues that the fundamental difference between the sensible paradigm and the eidetic paradigm lies not in a distinct explanatory function, but in the ontological nature of the entity that occupies the paradigmatic position. Based on an analysis of Aristotle’s Republic, Phaedo, Timaeus, and the Argument of Relatives, this article argues that Plato begins with a single paradigmatic structure with two modalities: sensible and eidetic.

Author Biography

Jesús Alfonso Peña Raigoza, Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango

Professor na Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango (UJED), México. 

References

ALLEN, R. E. Participation and predication in Plato’s middle dialogues. The Philosophical Review, v. 69, n. 2, p. 147-164, 1960.

ALVARADO, J. T. A metaphysics of Platonic universals and their instantiations. Cham: Springer, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50774-9.

ARISTÓTELES. Categorías. In: ARISTÓTELES. Tratados de lógica (Órganon). Madrid: Gredos, 1982.

ARISTÓTELES. Metafísica. Madrid: Gredos, 1994.

ARISTÓTELES. Sobre las Ideas. In: ARISTÓTELES. Fragmentos. Madrid: Gredos, 2005.

BALTZLY, Dirk. Plato, Aristotle and the logos ek ton pros ti. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, v. 1, 1997.

DEVEREUX, Daniel T. Separation and immanence in Plato’s theory of Forms. In: TAYLOR, C. C. W. (ed.). Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy. v. 12. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994, p. 63-90.

DUNCOMBE, Matthew. Ancient relativity: Plato, Aristotle, Stoics, and Sceptics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.

FINE, Gail. On Ideas: Aristotle’s criticism of Plato’s theory of Forms. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.

FINE, Gail. The “Two Worlds” theory in the Phaedo. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2016.1176892.

GONZÁLEZ VARELA, José E. El argumento a partir de los relativos del Peri Ideon. In: Tras las huellas de Platón y el platonismo en la filosofía moderna: de su simiente griega a la Ilustración. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 2013.

IRWIN, Terence H. Homonymy in Aristotle. The Review of Metaphysics, v. 34, p. 523-544, 1981.

MARMODORO, Anna. Forms and structure in Plato’s metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021.

OWEN, G. E. L. Logic and metaphysics in some earlier works of Aristotle. In: DÜRING, Ingemar;

OWEN, G. E. L. (ed.). Plato and Aristotle in the mid-fourth century. Göteborg: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1960.

PLATÓN. Fedón. In: PLATÓN. Diálogos III: Fedón, Banquete, Fedro. Trad. Carlos García Gual. Madrid: Gredos, 1988.

PLATÓN. República. In: PLATÓN. Diálogos IV. Trad. Conrado Eggers Lan. Madrid: Gredos, 1988.

PLATÓN. Timeo. In: PLATÓN. Diálogos VI. Trad. Francisco Lisi. Madrid: Gredos, 1992.

SEDLEY, David. Platonic causes. Phronesis, v. 43, n. 2, p. 114-132, 1998. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1163/15685289860511050.

Published

2026-10-29

Issue

Section

Articles