Distinction between Memory (Mneme) and Reminiscence (Anamnese) in Plato’s Philebus

Authors

  • Luiz Paulo Rouanet Professor na Universidade Federal de São João del-Rei - UFSJ

Keywords:

Plato, Memory, Reminiscence

Abstract

Maurizio Migliori (2013) suggests that we can find in Philebus elements to think about the distinction between memory (mneme) and reminiscence (anamnese). Here we will study this dialogue, trying to explore that distinction. The hypothesis is that, differently of what occurs in Menon, in the Philebus the distinction is a mere « immanent » one, in the sense that there are no reference or mention to the notorious « theory of reminiscence » evoked in the Menon, that is, to the idea that knowing consists only in the act of remembering something that was known or viewed in another life. To the end of checking that hypothesis, we will contrast the two dialogues.

Author Biography

Luiz Paulo Rouanet, Professor na Universidade Federal de São João del-Rei - UFSJ

Doutor em Filosofia pela FFLCH-USP. Foi professor da UNESP, PUC-SP, Universidade São Marcos, PUC-Campinas e atualmente é professor Adjunto IV da Universidade Federal de São João del-Rei - UFSJ.

Published

2020-10-09

Issue

Section

Articles