Zeno’s enterprise: a monument to creativity

Authors

  • Livio Rossetti Professor Emérito da Universidade de Perugia, Itália.

Keywords:

Zeno, paradox, infinitesimal, enigma, puzzle

Abstract

Zeno’s paradoxes, although they might appear to be simple theses directed against common perspectives, show themselves to be an extraordinary innovation for the purpose of creating science. In their argumentative structure they operate at a high philosophical level, and in a way that forbids us to reduce them to mere puzzles or dramatic presentations of problems to be solved. Zeno’s paradoxes retain their problematic status, serving as a provocative challenge to his interlocutors and to many commonly accepted notions, and thus permit us to regard him as the philosopher of philosophy.

References

J. Barnes et al., Zenone e l’infinito,Sankt Augustin 2011.

DK = H. Diels-W. Kranz, Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, griechisch und deutsch, I-III, Berlin 1951-52.

LM = A. Laks-G. Most, Early Greek Philosophy, in 9 vols., Cambridge MS 2016; A. Laks-G. Most, Les débuts de la Philosophie, des premiers penseurs grecs à Socrate, Paris 2016.

M. Meyer, De la problématologie: langage, science et philosophie, Bruxelles1986.

A. Plebe-P. Emanuele, Filosofi senza filosofia, Roma-Bari 1994.

L. Rossetti, «Zenone di Elea, maestro in comunicazione», in F. Cortés Gabaudan-J.V. Méndez Dosuna (eds.), DIC MIHI MUSA VIRUM. Homenaje al Profesor Antonio López Eire, Salamanca 2010, 595-602.

Id., «Caratteristiche tipologiche dei trattati PERI PHYSEOS nei secoli VI-V a.C.», Nova Tellus 24.2, 111-146 [2010b].

Id., «Peri Physeos», in P. Radici Colace (dir.), Dizionario delle scienze e delle tecniche di Grecia e Roma, Pisa-Roma 2010, 815-818.

Id., «I paradossi sono macchine per pensare», Diogene Magazine 36, 2014, 62-66.

Id., «La polumathia di Parmenide», Chôra 13, 2015, 193-216.

Id., Un altro Parmenide, I-II, Bologna 2017.

E. Schmalzriedt, Peri Physeos. ZurFr?hgeschichtederBuchtitel, M?nchen 1970.

Published

2017-10-29

Issue

Section

Articles