The eleatic heritage and ambiguity of no-being in Ancient materialism
Keywords:
atornism, being, no-being, epicurismAbstract
Mellissos argued that the being is both compact and infinite; were it a finite sphere, as Parmenides sustained, there would be beyond ir the emptness, therefore the the non-being would be. This is an absurd consequence found in the eleatic ontology, from which Leucippos and Democritos retained the attributes of the being, transposing them to a rnicrocosrnic scale: the elementary corpuscles are finite in regards to their magnitude, and infinite in number, moving against the backdrop of emptness. We examine, in particular, how these questions are treated in the phisics of Epicures.Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The contents of the manuscript have been tacitly or explicitly approved by the responsible authorities where the research was carried out.
Upon acceptation of the manuscript, the author agrees to allow its publication by Hypnos, declining pecuniary gains due from copyright. If the manuscript is published later in other media, the author agrees to always give credits of its first publication in Hypnos.
If the submitted document includes figures, tables, or large sections of text previously published, the author declares himself responsible for having obtained permission of the original copyright owners of these items for both the online and printed publication of this journal. Credits for copyrighted material must be properly attributed in the manuscript.