Persuasion and Coercion. On Aristotle’s Strategy in Defence of the Principle of Non-Contradiction in Metaphysics IV
Keywords:
Aristotle, defence of PNC, aporiaAbstract
In this paper I examine the relationship between the natural philosophers and the sophists in Met. IV 3-6, as well as Aristotle’s strategies for refuting them: persuasion and coercion. Firstly I analyze the taxonomy of the opponents of the PNC, where I consider three moments. Then I suggest a distinction that Aristotle seems tohave in mind between a genuine, real, aporia and a superfluous one. On this basis I try to illuminate the final step ot the taxonomy (Met. IV 6, 1011a3-8), where the natural philosophers and sophists are close to each other. Despite their differences, both, according to Aristotle, pose problems which could be solved easily by simply resorting to the obvious. Finally I try to clarify the kind of strategy proposed indefence of the PNC by appealing to some remarks on the search for truth in Met. II.
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
The contents of the manuscript have been tacitly or explicitly approved by the responsible authorities where the research was carried out.
Upon acceptation of the manuscript, the author agrees to allow its publication by Hypnos, declining pecuniary gains due from copyright. If the manuscript is published later in other media, the author agrees to always give credits of its first publication in Hypnos.
If the submitted document includes figures, tables, or large sections of text previously published, the author declares himself responsible for having obtained permission of the original copyright owners of these items for both the online and printed publication of this journal. Credits for copyrighted material must be properly attributed in the manuscript.
A revista 